Please see our new and updated sites below:
Bitte sehen Sie unsere neuen und aktuellen Webseiten hier:

www.InergetixForum.com (our Forum - 1 Million views per year)
www.iimed.info (Practitioner listing)
www.MedOKH.org (Spiritual Medicine)
www.virtualPill.net (Virtual Doctor site)
www.energetic-medicine.com (Technology dedicated site)
www.Bioresonance-LaesEr.com (Bioresonance site)
www.youtube.com/user/coreinergetix (YouTube channel with over 300 uploads)
       BioenergeticMedicine.org  &  BioenergetischeMedizin.de

 

  CoRe-System  
 
 
  Core-System deutsch  
 
 
  Screen Shots   
 
 
     
  Further Reading  
 

Postings to the Yahoo energetic Medicine News group:

 

 
   
 


 

CoRe-Model

The CoRe-Model models our world  as a coordinate system of Causality-Space and Information-Space (also called Coincidence/Synchronicity Space). Both are complementary and perpendicular in a mathematical sense. The norm declared on this coordinate system of dimensions is that of Uncertainty. The causality dimension has an Uncertainty degree of Zero, the Information dimension of infinite. 

Principles for the Causality-Space are well investigated like that of  preservation of Inertia, temporal and spatial dependencies of information and matter interaction, entropy increase, a.s.o.

The CoRe-Principles set forth  below however are formulated primarily for the Information-Space and are set in the language of energetic Medicine. 

There are possibly very few phenomena which comprise only one of the two dimensions, but some like e.g. very pure Coincidences have very little Causality-Component, whereas many of examples of classical physics under laboratory conditions have almost no Coincidence-Component. Part of the novelty of this Model is that it uses a coordinate system of dimensions (just like a x, y coordinate system) and not an unconnected duality. In practice this makes a big difference for example in viewing different so called paranormal effects. Some for example now from this point of reference might contain a lager degree of Causality component and others less.

All phenomena which are predictable and reproducible on an individualized basis are predominantly Causality-Space events. Many (not all) events that can only be measured in a statistical fashion have a larger Coincidence-Space Component.

Another distinguishing factor is to what degree a phenomenon is space or time dependent, those with a lesser degree of dependence on those variables have a greater proportion of the Coincidence-Dimension and vice versa. 

Obviously many emotional and mental processes have a greater space and time invariance and are therefore higher up on the Coincidence-Dimension. Also there are many psychological techniques to increase the amount of the Coincidence-Coordinate (see for example "The power of NOW" by Eckhart Tolle), but more on this in another chapter.


CoRe-Principles
The CoRe-Principles are a set of premises on which the software of the CoRe-System is based. I believe these principles have never been stated in this combination before.  Many bioenergetic Methods are based on those principles,... however much they are consciously understood or misunderstood.

Note: Remedy should mean in the following generally any physical substance, thought, symbol, pattern or any other imaginable entity.


1. The Remedy as well as the Patient  have many energetic states
2. The degree of significance of a given Remedy for a Patient can be estimated from the number of coincidences that show during the testing.
3. No means of communication or otherwise interaction between Remedy and Patient need to be assumed beyond Coincidence.
4. Pure Coincidences can be observed more clearly  under conditions in which they are not covered-up or restricted by causative forces.
5. These principles are valid not only for Remedy and Patient but for any combination of objects, pattern, thoughts, events or otherwise imaginable entities.

1. The Remedy as well as the Patient  have many energetic states (parallel as well as sequential)
It is obvious that each person goes through many different moods or physical dispositions even within one day, how much more must this be the case on a cellular or organ level were millions of functions have to be processed parallel and sequential.
Despite this fact regular testing methods consider it enough to do one test with the remedy and even more or less expect that the results should be the same over some period of time. Much less is there any consideration that the Remedy might go through different phases as well and may give different readings at different times.

In older systems of  healing it was an established practice that every herb had particular times at which it had to be collected and processed and also the treatment had to be performed with much consideration to time, celestial events and many other factors. I do not believe that much of this practice was understood by everyone practitioner nor that it was based on established experimental results in every aspect... but I want to hint at the fact that the expectation that the Patient or even the Remedy is always the same will lead to erroneous results and is part of the 19th century worldview of science.

In fact this is a good example of  how a model enslaves our thinking and judgment. ...Even of the most simple of all things, atomic particles, we know that there is no 100% certainty of what you will measure at any given moment.... now in a billion times more complex thing like a human organism we somehow expect that any sensible measuring instrument could give us reproducible results.... how illogical ! In the CoRe-Model there is no need to hide those non-reproducible results, as it includes the realm of coincidences which are considered meaningful (more on this later).

One conclusion from this first CoRe-Principle is therefore that results are usually of a statistical nature, never a clear cut Yes/No, Resonance/Non-Resonance answered. In order to be able to make statistical statements we have to make several or even many tests.
Second, we will not dismiss a method which does not produce reproducible results nor will we unconsciously try to manipulate a testing method in a way that it produces such results.
Third, we will try to find the time and circumstances in which a Remedy can be beneficial.
As was said above the state in which a Remedy is found, depends also on the mode of observation and different methods will produce necessarily different results, which is what one would expect based on this first principle.



2. The degree of significance of a given Remedy for a Patient can be estimated from the number of coincidences that show during the testing.
There are so many different testing methods and each one has its own way of determining Resonance. In one the indicator has to go to 50 in another to 80, in one the tension between thumb and index finger should remain strong, one needs the pendulum to swing clockwise the other needs it to spin counterclockwise, again other procedures consider a sticky sensation on a plate as the indicator, some only have to touch the ear or the pulse to read such resonance from a change in blood pressure or pulse pattern......and each one has a unique and different way to explain how and why these changes occur.

What all have in common however is that they look for a significant change of some measurable quantity which comes at the same time that the remedy is introduced. The second CoRe-Principle unites all these methods by stating that they are all based on finding a Coincidence between the fact of the Remedy being introduced and a change of indicator. .... it is a synchronistic event and not a physical effect as for example a  EDS reading will not change if you do not lift off the point probe and only change remedies.

Also different indicators will not necessarily give the same percentages. The Scenar is a good example in this respect, it combines indicators like change of sound, stickiness, impedance or patient sensation all in one method and experience proves that they do not come on together necessarily at the same time.

Principle 2 states therefore that resonance can be determined more reliably with a greater number of measurements and/or a greater combination of indicators. The CoRe-System tests coincidence of a variety pattern combined with the great frequency possible through a computer.


3. No means of communication or otherwise interaction between Remedy and Patient need to be assumed beyond Coincidence.
What would keep us to say that all these indicator changes are simply Coincidences as established Science would make us believe (if they do not consider it even unconscious manipulation or outright fraud).

If we understand the deep significance of Coincidence and its relationship to randomness (see the pages on Coincidence) we could easily agree with established science on this description. However lacking this understanding we search for pseudo-scientific explanations like scalar waves or subtle energies which despite their familiar sounding names really mean nothing as they do not have a theoretical or experimental background to support them. Even worse some fancy that the use of new terms would already establish a new science or set them apart from others who are "still stuck" in "old paradigms".

The CoRe-Principles set a different standard which is not opposed to established science (ES) but is truly complementary. Particularly Principle 3 tells us that besides all the effects that we can observe in the universe that are based on a Cause-And-Effect-relationship, there is another class for which we cannot and may never be able to show causes linking to the effect we observe. Established science would call those effects random, however we will discriminate those which are coincidental or synchronistic.

Here you can possibly feel the unsettling effect of a new science, it really turns your world view on its head. Compare this with the explanation via "subtle energies" and you might feel the difference, the first makes you think, the other makes you feel you already understand.

Actually it is not quite correct to say that the CoRe-Principles are complementary to Established Science, one might more exactly say that they are complementary to "The common (mis-)conception of established science". In fact quantum theory or most sciences that deal with complex systems are statistical and not causalistic in nature. For example Quantum Theory does not tell us why a particular wave function collapses into a specific value but tells us only that, given a particular setup, this value has a specific probability to occur. It does not tell us how a photon should know weather it should appear as a wave or a particle depending of the setup, but the wave function includes a description of the boundary condition (the setup) and thus give appropriate results. Now some people believe that if we can calculate something, we necessarily know its cause, however statistics shows that this is not the case. Therefore another definition of the Synchronistic dimension is that it is those dimensions of our experience in which we can only make statistical statements.

In the CoRe-Model the World is divided into two realms that of Phenomena which can be described with Cause-and-Effect Relationship and those which are Synchronistic or Coincidental. The boundary between the two groups is fluid and depends on our point of view and may change over time as we see more connections. It is not correct to believe that we ever could create a consistent world view where everything is causalistic nor is it correct to equate coincidental relationship with insufficient knowledge. To give a graphical example: ... that my body usually appears at the same time with my head is not because the appearance of my head is caused by my body, but because they are coincidental, they are connected. 

Now where we get into trouble is in all those areas where we do not see things always together at the same time, if you would see me always behind a fence which has some openings, you would sometimes see my head and sometimes see other parts of my body, if for some reason you would always see an arm first, you would (in a causalistic frame of mind) conclude that my head is caused by my arm. Now I believe that in the majority of things, we see only parts at a time and this is why the coincidental dimension is so essential to have a complete coordinate system of understanding.


Back to our Remedy and Patient... having the coincidental view point we consider that the Remedy-Patient-Combination which shows some kind of Coincidence in the setup as an indication that there is some kind of connection between the two (what kind of connection that may be we will discuss later on). Thus apparently random events like impedance change, sticky sensation, muscle strength, particular cloud formation in the sky, the output of an random event generator or whatever else it may be become meaningful indicators if analyzed without preconceived expectations  in a statistical fashion.  

This saves us a lot of unnecessary and misleading theory making of how Remedy and Patient are actually communicating. How we can visualize this connection between physically unconnected entities  with mathematic formalism and graphically will be discussed more in detail in the chapter about Similarity-Space and Networks.


4. Pure Coincidences have to be sought under conditions in which they are not covered-up or restricted by causative forces.

As was developed in the previous principles bioenergetic testing methods are using exactly those effects which not only cannot be explained by cause-and-effect reasoning but should in deed not be under the law of being-caused-by-something-else. In other words the involved effects should be part of the group of phenomena which is complementary to that group which follows causative laws.

The reason why we usually do not see coincidences is not because they are not abundant but because on one hand we are not looking for them, nor do we know how to look for them but mainly because they are usually heavily superimposed by causative effects. 

More on how one principally and technically separate phenomena of the two realms in a separate chapter. Established Science up to date has developed many ways to keep random events out of their experimental setup. CoRe is now suggesting the complementary approach to find ways to amplify the occurrence of pure random events and ways to make them meaningful.... another way to describe CoRe could be the "Science of random events"



5. These principles are valid not only for Remedy and Patient but for any combination of objects, pattern, thoughts, events or otherwise imaginable entities.

I will give mainly examples and experiments  from bioenergetic Medicine, but the CoRe-Model can be applied in any field of Science and has the potential to open up a new understanding of Random events and in this way maybe the Stone (random effects) that the builders rejected (because it did not fit in their theoretical construction) and that may become the Cornerstone of a more complete Model of what we can experience.


Warning!   None, of the above or anything on this site has been evaluated by the FDA, on the contrary Radionics is not considered a viable form of treatment in the USA. The CoRe-System is only intended for Export or for personal experimental Use. There are no claims made, if the words "cure", "treat", "diagnose" are used anywhere on this site it shall always be understood that his is meant in the context of "personal experimental use" only.
 

Warning! None, of the above or anything on this site has been evaluated by the FDA, on the contrary Radionics is not considered a viable form of treatment in the USA. The CoRe-System is only intended for Export or for personal experimental use in the US. There are no claims made, if the words "cure", "treat", "diagnose" are used anywhere on this site or in the software it shall always be understood that his is meant in the context of "personal experimental use" only. For more details click here